ARMY Boycotts “Billboard” Magazine, Demands Apology For BTS
ARMY is voicing concerns about Billboard’s new article.
In the interview, BTS fielded commonly asked questions, such as their thoughts on the COVID-19 pandemic, but also more controversial ones that some ARMYs found offensive. BTS were asked directly about chart manipulation, and more specifically, their fans’ involvement.
Through above-board means, ARMY has long exploited loopholes in music chart rules (including those of Billboard) to propel BTS singles’ performance.
— Billboard
ARMY’s alleged “manipulation” involves boosting sales, purchasing and streaming multiple versions of the same song (such as the “Butter” remixes), and choosing dedicated days for streaming and/or purchasing a particular song to greatly impact its chart performance. This “manipulation,” however, is actually organization and, as Billboard noted, well within the rules.
RM and the president of Big Hit Music, Shin Young Jae told Billboard as much.
It’s a fair question. But if there is a conversation inside Billboard about what being No. 1 should represent, then it’s up to them to change the rules and make streaming weigh more on the ranking. Slamming us or our fans for getting to No. 1 with physical sales and downloads, I don’t know if that’s right … It just feels like we’re easy targets because we’re a boy band, a K-pop act, and we have this high fan loyalty.
— RM
Fans are now slamming Billboard for bringing up chart manipulation rather than asking BTS about their chart achievements. Some have also questioned whether Billboard would ask their other No.1 artists about chart manipulation.
WHERE WAS THIS ENERGY WITH WESTERN ARTIST WHEN HE LITERALLY BEGGED HIS FANS TO USE VPN?? ITS IN CLEAR WORDS "CHART MANIPULATION" @billboard !??? pic.twitter.com/pID3JfWk8O
— alien ⁷ (@jeonmjtaee) August 26, 2021
This is not, however, the only problem ARMY has with the article. Another point of contention is the inclusion of quotes from fans of singers Olivia Rodrigo and Dua Lipa. These fans discredited the success of BTS’s song “Butter.”
On the July 24 chart, “Permission to Dance” debuted at No. 1 with 140,100 total sales, according to MRC Data, with “Butter” falling six spots to No. 7 and Rodrigo’s “good 4 u” holding at No. 2. But then, something highly unusual happened: The next week, “Butter” returned to No. 1 (leapfrogging Rodrigo and others) and switched places with “Permission,” which slipped to No. 7.
— Billboard
As Billboard stated, the singers’ fans, “claimed that it wasn’t a coincidence.”
@scrappyseal, noting the reversal, tweeted that BTS had ‘0 GP [general public] support. A real smash is sustained by the GP support.’ Another fan of both Rodrigo and Lipa’s, @lipaanostalgia, described BTS as having ‘fraudulent ways’ and its fans as ‘involved in chart manipulation’ and ‘mass buying.’
— Billboard
ARMYs are accusing Billboard of needlessly chronicling and inciting fan wars in an article that they had hoped would focus on BTS’s success.
In addition to chart manipulation and rival fandoms, the magazine mentioned another ever-controversial topic: military service. In particular, fans are taking issue with how BTS’s enlistment was mentioned in tangent with HYBE‘s profits, as well as the idea that “anything could replace BTS on the company’s balance sheet.”
[Military enlistment is] bad news for HYBE. BTS is the dominant engine behind the company’s income, bringing in about 85% of its 796.3 billion won ($680 million) in total 2020 revenue.
Though HYBE has begun diversifying its portfolio of talent — signing new K-pop acts and, starting next year, partnering with Universal Music Group (UMG) on a U.S.-based boy band talent show — it remains unclear whether anything could replace BTS on the company’s balance sheet.
— BillboardNow, some ARMYs are discouraging fellow fans from buying the magazine, citing the aforementioned issues. Others are tweeting #BillboardApologizeToBTS and related hashtags, demanding an apology on BTS’s behalf.
SOURCE: https://www.koreaboo.com/news/bts-billboard-boycott-backlash-fans-boycott-apology/
Comments